Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Invasive Plants topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves 49 South Parkview plan after debate over invasive groundcovers; Vinca and pachysandra to be replaced

5381345 · July 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a landscape plan for 49 South Parkview but required removal of Vinca minor and pachysandra from the proposed palette, prompting discussion about lists of prohibited/invasive plants and a follow‑up workgroup to recommend species guidance.

The Bexley Tree and Public Gardens Commission approved a landscape plan for 49 South Parkview on June 18 after a lengthy discussion about invasive and potentially invasive groundcovers. The applicant’s designer, Steven Marovich, presented a plan that retained an existing framing hedge, added smaller trees and shrubs, and proposed perennials and groundcovers; portions of the planting schedule were intended for a later phase. Commissioners raised concerns about two proposed groundcovers — Vinca minor and Japanese pachysandra — citing state and regional invasive lists and local experience with those species escaping cultivation. Walter Raines, the commission’s consultant, and several commissioners urged substitution with noninvasive alternatives. After discussion a motion to approve the plan “as presented” failed in voice voting confusion; the commission then approved the plan with a motion that required replacing Vinca and pachysandra with noninvasive alternatives. Why it matters: commissioners said avoiding invasive groundcovers protects city rights‑of‑way, natural areas and downstream biodiversity. Several commissioners asked staff to compile a recommended/prohibited plant list for applicants, and Mayor Kessler encouraged using established state or regional lists (for example, Ohio Department of Agriculture or Ohio Invasive Plants Council) as standards. Supporting details: The plan includes options to remove two declining maples in the lawn strip and install larger replacement trees if the city and homeowner coordinate irrigation and planting; the applicant indicated some perennials and annuals were being deferred for cost reasons, with hardscape work prioritized first. Staff confirmed that irrigation in the city right‑of‑way is allowed with a consent and hold‑harmless agreement with the water department. Next steps: the commission asked staff to develop a list of species guidance (prohibited, watchlist, recommended alternatives) and invited commissioners to join a small working group to draft guidance for future applications.