Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters urge more mental-health education, a copy of Man's Search for Meaning and teaching of the Bible
Summary
Several members of the public spoke during the meeting's public-comment period urging additions to the curriculum, including a recommended text and expanded mental-health instruction; others urged instruction in the Bible as part of history or elective courses.
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Several members of the public used the meeting's public-comment period to urge changes to the district curriculum, focusing on mental-health instruction and the inclusion of particular readings and religious material.
Ed O'Donnell of Ocean City urged the board to ensure every high-school student reads Man's Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl and said his charity has donated about 400 copies to schools in the past. O'Donnell described the book as a powerful account of survival that he recommends for high-school readers and offered to help the district obtain copies. He also recommended mental-health and related elective courses (for example, health, coping with tension, anger management and family relations) and suggested a sequence of physical health, mental health, philosophy and world religions.
Linda Carnuccia, a long-time Ocean City resident, spoke in favor of offering elective courses that include study of the Bible (both Old and New Testaments) as a way to teach history and civic foundations. She said Ocean City has historical Judeo-Christian roots and that teaching the Bible would help instill “family values and solid moral principles.”
A third speaker identifying himself as Nelson, "tribe of Asher," criticized public education content and spoke about constitutional issues and flags; his remarks were presented as personal claims and historical interpretation rather than board-endorsed facts.
Board members did not respond to public comments during the meeting. The comments were presented under the district's public-comment rules; the board advised speakers that matters involving litigation, students or personnel would be handled privately with the chief school administrator and are not discussed in public meetings.

