Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Beverly Planning Board unanimously consents to repetitive petition for 114 Livingston Avenue

July 02, 2025 | Beverly City, Essex County, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Beverly Planning Board unanimously consents to repetitive petition for 114 Livingston Avenue
The Beverly Planning Board voted 8-0 on July 2 to consent to a repetitive petition from 7 Porter Terrace LLC, owner Brian Marks, to allow the applicant to return to the Zoning Board of Appeals on a denied building permit for 114 Livingston Avenue.

The board’s vote follows a Department of Environmental Protection superseding order and a subsequent finding by the Beverly Conservation Commission that the feature previously treated as a wetland is a municipal drainage structure. Marshall Henley, the applicant’s representative, told the board that the DEP determination “issued a superseding order identifying the so called, wetland resource as a drainage structure of the city of Beverly,” and that the commission’s finding restored the lot area above the 10,000-square-foot minimum required by the zoning code.

The planning board framed its role narrowly. Vice Chair Derek Beckwith said the board’s job “is not to make any decision or opinion on the merits of your argument, just whether or not there's substantial or specific and material change” in the application sufficient to permit the zoning authority to reconsider the permit denial.

Board members asked clarifying questions about the prior Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) decision, which Henley said had upheld the building commissioner’s denial based on reduced lot area due to the commission’s earlier wetland finding; the ZBA had declined to rule on a frontage issue as moot. Henley said the DEP action and the Conservation Commission’s subsequent finding overturn the factual basis of that earlier decision.

After closing public comment (none was received), the planning board voted to consent to the repetitive petition. The board’s consent is procedural: it allows the applicant to return to the ZBA; it does not grant a building permit or decide the permit’s merits.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI