This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The Reston Design Review Board on April 15 denied an appeal by the Whisperwood Cluster Association challenging a DRB decision that required replacement plantings for trees removed from common areas.
Sally (Whisperwood Cluster Association president) told the board she and the cluster had received conflicting guidance: cluster staff and published Reston guidelines appeared to say dead trees not shown on a DRB-approved landscape plan are not required to be replaced, while the January decision appeared to require replacements. She asked the board to reduce the number of required replacements and to allow fall planting rather than the June deadline cited in the decision.
DRB members and staff said the replacement quantity was derived from a staff investigation prompted by a complaint from an affected resident (identified in the record as Mrs. Keener). Staff confirmed seven removed trees could be positively identified on site; aerial imagery and the complaint suggested additional removals but did not show stumps for every location. The panel settled on a replacement number of 11 to account for seven confirmed removals plus additional canopy losses that staff concluded were likely based on aerial progression.
The board determined the case did not present new information nor show a misapplication of the design guideline and moved to deny the appeal. The motion to deny the appeal carried on a recorded vote of 4–0–3 (four votes to deny, three ineligible to vote because they had served on the original panel). The board’s decision includes a stipulation that replacements provide “similar canopy coverage” to what was removed rather than mandating exact locations; staff will work with the cluster on a planting plan and the matter will return to a panel review (rather than the full board) to expedite implementation.
Staff noted clusters should document dead-tree removals with an arborist’s statement and that dead-tree removal does not require a DRB application when a replacement is being made under an existing DRB-approved landscaping plan; if replacement will not occur as part of an existing approved plan, a formal application is required. The board also advised the cluster they may request a planting timeline extension to shift planting to fall for better tree establishment.
The board instructed staff to work with the cluster on a replanting plan; staff confirmed the panel would handle the follow-up review.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,055 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit