The committee examined proposed rules to require tree‑service contractors who work in the city to register and demonstrate competence, insurance and worker coverage before receiving work permits.
Councilman Cooney said the registration is intended to protect residents contracting tree services: "That way there's some protection for the residents saying are you a registered contractor when they contract with them," he said. The draft requires proof of insurance and workers' compensation and contemplates checks of references and equipment.
Nut graf: Committee members generally approved requiring registration and basic documentation but questioned how the city would objectively verify technical competence and whether requiring ISA or ANSI arborist certification should be mandatory or one acceptable path to demonstrate fitness.
Committee members debated a clause that would require contractors to be ISA‑certified or meet ANSI standards. Bill (building department staff) and others said a checklist of credentials (insurance, proof of tools/equipment, references, and a current arborist credential where applicable) could be used during registration. "If they're accredited like they can do," one committee member said of certification as a practical competency demonstration.
Members cautioned against making certification the only path. Several members suggested the city could accept a contractor who demonstrates fitness by providing references and evidence of tools and experience, with the ability for the city to revoke registration for poor performance. The Building Commissioner said the permit process and subsequent inspections are the practical enforcement mechanism to identify unqualified firms once work begins.
No formal vote was recorded. The committee directed staff to incorporate registration requirements, require insurance and workers' compensation, and to return with revised language that clarifies whether certification is mandatory or an alternative means of demonstrating competence.