Board hears update on blight complaints; staff to pursue legal action on at least one site

5375498 · July 12, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning staff reported multiple complaint-driven blight enforcement cases and said counsel will assist in legal action; the derelict-property ordinance is complaint-based and requires complainant identification.

County planning staff updated the board on enforcement under the county’s derelict-property/blight ordinance, noting multiple complaint-driven cases and telling the board that legal action is recommended for at least one address. Staff said three letters were sent in late May under state code timelines and that one property on Woodard Road has not been remedied; staff recommended proceeding with legal action to compel cleanup. Another property on Piney Green Road is under active review with six days remaining in the compliance period, and a third matter on Raccoon Crossing Road has an incorrect address in land records that staff is working to resolve. Board members and staff reiterated that the county’s blight ordinance operates on a complaint basis — complaints must include the complainant’s name and contact information — and that the county typically follows a process that includes a notice period, potential court action and, in some cases, a judge-ordered compliance timeline. Staff said the court often provides time for remediation unless there is an immediate public-health or safety threat. No formal board action was taken beyond direction to proceed with counsel-assisted enforcement steps for the qualifying case and to continue the complaint process for the others.