Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ai In Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Virginia Beach plans cautious AI rollout for high schools, emphasizes digital literacy and safety
Summary
District leaders outlined a phased, high‑school‑first approach to generative AI, recommended Google Gemini as a safe starting environment, and described required staff training, student digital‑literacy modules and safeguards including COPPA/CIPA/FERPA checks and Lightspeed monitoring of Chromebook screen time.
Virginia Beach City Public Schools outlined a deliberate, phased plan to introduce generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to high schools and to strengthen systemwide digital‑literacy and Internet‑safety practices during its July 8 retreat.
"We believe thoughtful adoption matters more than early adoption," said Dr. Danielle Colucci, the district’s chief academic officer, describing the division’s emphasis on understanding the technology before broad classroom access.
Chief Information Officer David Den and Colucci described three pillars of the plan: staff capacity building, student digital‑literacy instruction and technical safeguards. The district recommended a limited pilot using Google’s Gemini teen‑friendly environment for high school classrooms because the tool can run inside Google Workspace for Education and meets student privacy requirements the district cited (COPPA, CIPA, and enterprise Google safeguards were mentioned by staff).
High‑school administrators and teachers will be required to complete an AI essentials module (a brief, stated 90‑minute module), set explicit classroom expectations for AI use, and require students to disclose when AI contributed to assignments. Colucci said teachers will also receive professional learning on "AI‑resistant" assignment design and how to use AI to evoke higher‑order thinking rather than to replace student reasoning.
The district emphasized that implementation will be slow and optional for teachers: some instructors may choose to allow limited, monitored classroom use of an approved tool, while others may forbid AI in their classes. Staff said classroom choices must be accompanied by clear teacher expectations and agreements with students.
Safety and monitoring measures described include use of the district’s app approval process (ensuring COPPA compliance and data‑privacy pledges), the Lightspeed monitoring tool to report Chromebook usage and patterns, and vendor vetting via 1EdTech and other privacy certifications. The district reported pulling Lightspeed screen‑time averages for primary grades and said administrators will be trained to analyze those reports; staff emphasized the district does not permit social or passive screen time during school.
Board members asked how the district will guard against overreliance and impacts on students’ critical thinking. Colucci pointed to professional learning, the required staff module, and ongoing in‑school coaching through instructional‑technology specialists and library media specialists as the primary controls. Officials said the state and federal guidance (including executive orders referenced by staff) informed the timeline and training expectations.
Ending: District leaders said they will continue regular updates and provide quarterly or periodic briefings on AI rollout, training completion and observed classroom practices. They also noted that approved use will remain limited to high schools while the district monitors impacts and refines guidance.
