Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alcohol Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council declines further study of state open‑container option after concerns about policing, crowding and town character
Summary
After a wide-ranging discussion of House Bill 1515’s authorization for designated open‑container areas, Leavenworth councilors voted not to pursue a study session on adopting such rules, citing enforcement, tourism impacts and community values.
The Leavenworth City Council declined July 8 to pursue further study of a state law (House Bill 1515) that allows municipalities to create designated small open‑container areas for alcohol consumption, saying the city would likely not benefit and raising concerns about enforcement and impacts on downtown character.
Staff presented background on the new state law and said the Association of Washington Cities (AWC) had asked whether the city wanted to consider adopting an open‑container designation. Supporters at the state level originally promoted the bill for special events such as the FIFA World Cup; staff said the law offers cities flexibility to define areas and hours. "You could define the area. You could define it when," staff said.
Multiple council members expressed concern about practical enforcement and about increasing public drinking in a town that had recently scaled back the size of its Oktoberfest event to reduce problems. Councilor Zeke said, "I don't see a real advantage of doing it...we have had success in downsizing Oktoberfest," and other members echoed worries about more public intoxication, policing costs, and the potential to create “binge drinking” incentives.
Several members said structured partnerships—Rotary, Lions Club, museums and the Chamber—could better advance community events without expanding open‑container allowances. After discussion, the mayor said he would tell the AWC contact that the council did not want to pursue a study session. "I'm not hearing more than four voices that support this idea, so thank you. We won't waste your time in the future study session," he said.
Outcome: staff will inform the AWC contact that the council does not wish to pursue creation of open‑container designations under HB 1515 at this time. No ordinance or policy change will be initiated.
Context: the state law was discussed in part because other communities proposed temporary open‑container areas for large events; council members repeatedly cited local enforcement practicalities and town character as reasons to decline further study.
