Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Streets Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members recommend $650,000 in materials for Richland Road reconstruction
Summary
At a meeting of Other Public Meetings — Taxonomy, members voted to recommend that the city council approve $650,000 to supply materials for a joint street reconstruction project on Richland Road between Bridal and Wilshire; the county would provide labor and the project number will be corrected to PJCA0063.
Members at a meeting of Other Public Meetings — Taxonomy voted to recommend that the city council approve $650,000 to supply materials for a street reconstruction project on Richland Road between Bridal and Wilshire.
The recommendation matters because the project will be a joint effort with Canadian County, with the county providing labor while the city pays for materials, and the committee resolved a discrepancy in the project number before advancing the item to council review.
Ryan Concha, Bond Group staff, told members the item was "for consideration, $650,000 for street reconstruction along Richland Road from, Bridal to Wilshire. It's a PGA project since it's gonna be a project that's joint with the county." Concha said, "We're gonna supply the materials. That's what the $650,000 is for, and they're gonna supply the labor." Members noted a numbering discrepancy between the agenda (PC-0990) and the memorandum; Concha said the official designation will be changed to PJCA0063.
A committee member asked whether the portion of the road to be reconstructed was within Oklahoma City; Concha replied, "It's all Oklahoma City." The member who made the motion recommended the item and it was seconded; the group then took a voice vote. The presiding member announced, "Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. It carries." The meeting record did not name the mover or the seconder.
Discussion at the meeting was limited to the project scope, the intergovernmental partnership with Canadian County, the change in the project number, and confirmation that the city's $650,000 would cover materials while the county would supply labor. No additional funding breakdown, schedule, contractor selection, or implementation timeline was provided during the discussion.
The committee directed staff to correct the project number in the official item and forwarded the recommendation to the city council for approval. No further action was taken at the meeting on this item.
