Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Work Plan Update topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Administrator briefs committee on 2025 work plan; detailed review deferred to next meeting

5355223 · July 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Administrator Leonard provided an overview of how the 2025 work plan is organized, said a full review will be scheduled for the next meeting, and reported vote counts for several top projects; no committee action was taken.

Administrator Leonard told the Marathon County executive committee he had emailed the 2025 work plan earlier that day and apologized for the late delivery, and he provided a brief update on how the work plan is organized and how members previously ranked priorities.

Leonard said he would not walk the committee through the full document because members had not had time to review it and the work plan was not in the meeting packet; he offered to answer questions outside the meeting and to present a full discussion at the committee's next meeting.

He described the document structure as organized across categories: facilities‑related projects, operational projects, budget and financial projects, miscellaneous directives, and intergovernmental partner work. Leonard said each project in the document is annotated with how it ranked in the committee's overall prioritization exercise and acknowledged he had omitted parenthetical ranking numbers for projects 1A, 1B and 1C in the version he sent; he said he would send an updated document.

As an example of the ranking data that will be provided, Leonard said project 1A received 17 votes, 1B received 3 and 1C received 13. He praised staff for progress on the work plan items and encouraged members to review the updated document and raise questions at the next meeting.

No motion or formal action was taken on the work plan at this meeting; committee members asked no substantive questions during the brief update and the item was closed with the plan to return for a full review later.