Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vienna utility officials discuss Pond Run dredging, stormwater funding and possible incentives
Summary
At a Vienna Utility Board meeting, staff and members discussed completed dredging drawings for Pond Run, constraints on stormwater funds, a pending rate study that could raise commercial stormwater fees and possible incentives for rain gardens and retention systems.
At a recent meeting of the Vienna Utility Board, staff and members outlined a plan to dredge Pond Run and described limits on stormwater funding, while discussing incentives and ordinance enforcement to reduce street runoff.
The board was told the drawings for the Pond Run/dry-dam dredging project are complete and the project has entered environmental review, though staff said they still must coordinate with mall property owners and verify easements before work begins. "We have got the drawings completed. We're going through environmental now. We still need to meet with the folks at the mall just to make sure they're aware of what we're doing," a public works superintendent said.
The meeting featured an extended discussion about how stormwater work is funded. A utility manager said the city charges a monthly stormwater fee of $4 for residential accounts and $10 for commercial accounts, and that the city budget includes a roughly $100,000 annual charge tied to stormwater. "It's on a monthly fee for the residents of $4 for a residential count and a commercial is $10 per month. We also charge the city $100,000 a year for stormwater issues," the utility manager said.
Board members and participants repeatedly stressed that stormwater, water and sewer funds cannot be commingled and that stormwater projects must be planned through the utility's multi‑year work plan. "There are separate pots of money that you have to take that funding from," a participant said, describing the need to place projects into a five‑year plan and advance engineering and easement work before construction.
The board heard that a rate study underway could raise commercial stormwater fees substantially; staff said the study's results and any rate changes will affect incentives for commercial property owners to install retention systems. "Once we get that rate study or rate applied to the commercial accounts, it's gonna go up... Then people have that structure, so we'll get discount rate," the utility manager said, adding that many commercial properties are already installing retention systems.
Several members urged incentives and outreach to reduce runoff at the parcel level. A board member suggested offering temporary fee reductions for property owners who install rain gardens, and others recommended tying compliance checks to property transfers. "You cannot transfer a deed in the city of Vienna and not be in compliance with the ordinance to eliminate your stormwater running right out on the street" was discussed as an idea during the meeting, but attendees noted feasibility limits where clay soils or low elevations make infiltration impractical.
Staff described smaller, targeted retention projects the city has installed and funds available for commercial retention systems, and cited an example where a retention installation stopped recurring flooding at a location after it was completed. The public works superintendent said that dredging Pond Run should improve citywide flows but cautioned that broader river and downstream conditions — including river stage on the Ohio River — limit how quickly floodwaters can drain.
Other utility items reported to the board included that the latest consumer water‑quality test result was dated June 27 and that the city's Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) will be mailed when published. Staff also updated the board on bridge projects that will require water and sewer relocations, including design work related to a 20 Seventh Street bridge relocation and work on Twelfth Street and Seventeenth Street bridges.
No formal votes or motions were recorded in the transcript segment reviewed. Board members directed staff to continue engineering, easement verification and environmental review for the Pond Run work and to factor stormwater funding and enforcement options into upcoming five‑year planning and the rate study.
The board agreed to continue discussions, including potential ordinance adjustments, incentive programs, and greater public outreach to encourage retention systems on private property.
