Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety Crosswalks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Needham panel asks engineers to study new crosswalk treatments, school-zone changes at Cedar and Central near Elliott School
Summary
The Transportation Safety Committee voted July 9 to ask engineering and mobility planning to study pedestrian refuge islands, an RRFB on the southwest corner and a school‑zone reassessment at the Central/Cedar intersection near Elliott School after residents reported repeated near misses.
The Town of Needham Transportation Safety Committee voted July 9 to ask Town engineering, the Department of Public Works and mobility planning to study multiple traffic treatments at the Central Avenue–Cedar Street intersection serving Elliott School, including a pedestrian refuge island on Cedar Street, an RRFB (rectangular rapid‑flashing beacon) on the southwest corner that would actuate across the Cedar crossing, a school‑zone signage reassessment and possible flashing stop or turn‑yield signs.
Why it matters: residents and parents told the committee they regularly see drivers make fast turning movements at the three‑way intersection and reported monthly near misses involving children crossing to and from Elliott. Petitioner testimony described children crossing two separate crosswalks to reach the school and urged consolidation or other engineering fixes to reduce exposure.
Petitioners described the problem in detail. Resident Caitlin said: “This crosswalk is used daily by children to reach the Elliott School. The crosswalk that goes across Cedar Street lacks any warning system.” Resident Greg Geller said drivers “are making a really fast right” from Central and recorded “a lot of near misses.” State Senator Becca Rausch (speaking as a resident) urged the committee to identify statutory or policy changes that could support any recommended work.
Engineering staff said the committee faces regulatory and geometric limits at the location: a stop sign on Cedar places signage and sight‑line constraints near the driveway and existing poles; moving beacons or installing a second head would raise MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices) compliance questions and might confuse drivers if both crossings flash together. Staff said some options are feasible and others would be “unorthodox,” and they recommended a feasibility study that would evaluate short‑, medium‑ and long‑term fixes and measure effects where appropriate.
Committee action: Chair Justin McCullen read a motion asking engineering, DPW and mobility planning to evaluate (1) a pedestrian refuge island on Cedar Street at Central, (2) feasibility of an RRFB on the southwest corner actuating the Cedar crossing, (3) a school‑zone reassessment around Elliott (including location and beaconing), and (4) feasibility of a flashing stop sign at Cedar and yield‑on‑turn signage for approaching vehicles. The motion also requested coordination with the Needham Police Department and the school department for enforcement and communications. The motion was approved by voice vote.
What comes next: engineering staff said they will return with a preliminary assessment and feasibility feedback; the committee asked for before‑and‑after speed and volume measures where pilot treatments are installed and for a communications plan to coordinate with the school and police before any signs are activated for the school year.
