The Framingham City Council on June 17 discussed proposed amendments to the demolition‑delay bylaw that would change timing and scope for review of demolition requests on architecturally or historically significant properties but ultimately voted to table the proposal for further study.

What was proposed: The Rules, Ordinance and Ethics subcommittee and the Historic Commission presented amendments that would, for certain architecturally or historically significant properties, extend the initial demolition‑delay period (from six months to 12 months) and the longer delay window (from 12 months to 18 months) to give more time for alternatives to demolition. The draft also removed an explicit “demolition by neglect” provision after the Historic Commission and staff said enforcement in practice is difficult.

Why proponents sought change: Historic Commission members and subcommittee chairs said the extended delay windows give residents, preservation groups and potential buyers more time to find alternatives to demolition on properties with demonstrated historic or architectural value.

Opposition and concerns: Several councilors and callers urged care before lengthening bylaw delays, saying a significantly longer statutory waiting period is a major change that affects property owners’ rights and could create unintended consequences. Some members urged further review of comparable practices in other communities and of enforcement tools to address neglect.

Council action: Councilor Bridal moved to approve the amendments; the motion was seconded and debated. After extended discussion the council voted 7–4 to table the proposal for additional review and public input.

Next steps: Councilors and the Historic Commission said they will continue work, hold additional outreach and return the item when outstanding legal, enforcement and community questions are addressed.