Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Battery Storage Moratorium topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council discusses moratorium on large battery-storage projects, tables for more research

5338790 · June 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hearing concerns about safety and the need for coordination with the port and utilities, the council discussed a proposed moratorium on large commercial battery-storage facilities and agreed to gather more information and return the item at a later meeting.

The La Conner Town Council held an extended discussion about a proposed moratorium on large commercial battery-storage (electrical energy storage) facilities within town limits but did not adopt a moratorium at the meeting.

Michael Wirtz, a town staff member, summarized outreach to the Port and utility provider PSE; the port opposed unregulated siting and offered to work with the town on regulations. Staff said there are groups in Skagit County already working on standards and that commercial battery-storage proposals elsewhere had prompted safety concerns. Council members and staff described technical fire-suppression and containment considerations and said that large installations require planning for water supply, containment and long-term incident response.

Council discussion split. Several members urged more study rather than an immediate ban, noting the town’s school system has a grant-funded battery resiliency project that could be affected. Others said a moratorium would buy time to draft safety rules tailored to commercial-scale installations and suggested any moratorium be limited to commercial and industrial zones or to exclude public-school projects. The council agreed to gather additional information, work with the port and utility providers, and return with a draft ordinance or a revised proposal at a future meeting. Staff and council asked for more detail on exemptions (for schools and public facilities) and zone-based limits.

No formal moratorium was adopted at this meeting; staff were directed to research technical requirements and draft options for council consideration.