Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee forwards $200,000 trust-fund commitment for Riverside Landing to full council

5335775 · June 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Administration and Finance Committee voted June 9 to send a favorable recommendation to full council for Resolution 2025-R-64, which would commit $200,000 from the Cabell Huntington Wayne Home Investment Trust Fund toward Riverside Landing, a proposed affordable housing project at 3224 Riverside Drive.

On June 9, 2025, the Administration and Finance Committee voted to forward to full council a favorable recommendation for Resolution 2025-R-64, which would commit $200,000 from the Cabell Huntington Wayne Home Investment Trust Fund to Riverside Landing, a proposed affordable-housing development at 3224 Riverside Drive.

The project presentation was given by Miss Burns, a staff member, who said the developer, Spire Development, proposes new construction called Riverside Landing with a total development cost of $8,600,000. Burns said the financing plan includes a mortgage, West Virginia HOME program dollars, tax-credit equity and that the Cabell Huntington Wayne Home Investment Trust Fund request would be the "last money in" of $200,000.

The committee was told the project received approval from the Cabell-Wayne local home consortium on May 28 and that the planning commission approved the on-site plan because the site exceeds one acre. Committee members praised the proposal; Ms. Holly made the motion to forward the resolution to full council with a favorable recommendation, Mr. Archer seconded, and members present voted in favor.

Burns described the unit mix as "32 units, 22 bedroom and 12 3 bedroom units" during her presentation; the committee record also lists the total unit count as 32. The transcript contains an inconsistency between the line-item unit counts and the stated total; that discrepancy was not resolved during the committee discussion and is noted here for clarification.

The committee meeting included roll call confirming a quorum; Miss Rumble was absent. With the committee’s favorable recommendation and a committee member volunteering to sponsor the item at council, the next step is full council consideration of Resolution 2025-R-64.

Details omitted from the committee discussion include whether tax-credit allocations are finalized and the timetable for construction; Burns did not state those items during the presentation.