This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
City staff told the committee that King County requested two minor amendments to Redmond’s Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishing an opioid abatement council: permission for King County to hold any reimbursements of administrative fees until the disbursement period for settlement funds (which may extend up to 17 years) and clarified timelines for when cities must respond to proposed changes to the MOU.
COO Files explained the county performs substantial administrative work for participating cities — collecting data, monitoring receipts and reporting to the state under the One Washington MOU — and that the county has asked to hold reimbursements to match the settlement disbursement timeline. Files said King County has used the city’s administrative fees to date and that the MOU currently provides for annual reimbursement but does not mandate treatment of interest or long-term holding of funds. Files told the committee the county has proposed parameters for when cities must respond to county-initiated changes to the agreement.
Council Member Forsyth asked whether holding money for up to 17 years could affect the city’s budget process; Files said she did not expect a material problem given the county’s approach to allocating admin fees across the payment timeline. Council Member Nueva Camino asked whether the MOU contains direction about interest earned if money is held; Files said the MOU does not state a requirement for interest disposition and noted the city pays a nominal $10,000 a year for the county to administer reporting and data collection.
Files said staff expects to place the amendment on the July 15 consent agenda and offered to provide a citywide accounting and update on how settlement funds are being used during 2025; council members indicated interest in receiving that briefing.
The committee had no objections to placing the amendment on the July 15 consent agenda.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,055 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit