Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Controlled Substances Disposal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Arkansas removes hospitals from state disposal rule to align with DEA procedures
Summary
The Arkansas Department of Health told a legislative committee it is amending state disposal rules to remove hospitals (DEA registrants) from state take‑back procedures and to update language for clarity; the committee reviewed the change without objection.
Arkansas Department of Health staff told a legislative committee they are updating the state's controlled‑substance disposal rule to remove hospitals from the state take‑back process because hospitals are DEA registrants required to follow federal disposal processes.
Why it matters: the change affects which facilities must use the department's drug take‑back process and clarifies that hospitals must follow DEA disposal rules rather than state collection services.
Department presenters said the proposed change stems from a desire to align the department's general disposal rule with the specific hospital rule and with federal requirements. "Hospitals are DEA registrants and are required to comply with DEA disposal processes as outlined in 13 17," one presenter said, noting that hospitals have not been sending controlled substances to the department's take‑back program for some time.
The department explained its existing take‑back service is intended primarily for non‑DEA registrants such as long‑term care and assisted‑living facilities, which send unwanted medications to the department for inventory and destruction. A committee member, identified in the transcript as Sandra Love, asked whether removing hospitals from the state rule meant the agency had previously failed to comply with its own rules; agency staff responded that the change is an administrative update to reflect current practice and to make the general rule uniform with the specific hospital rule.
The presenters said stakeholders were notified and no public comments were received on this particular amendment. The committee reviewed the disposal rule amendment and recorded no objection.
Less critical details: staff described several minor editorial changes and "BLR recommended cleanup changes" to the rule language; they offered to answer follow‑up questions and to provide additional clarifying language in subsequent rule drafts.
