Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Task force debates how detailed to make ‘critical threats’; agrees on categories to guide consolidation
Summary
Task force members debated the level of specificity needed in the draft critical threats for the Forest Resilience Plan and agreed to organize threats by categories—informational, socioeconomic and ecological—before consolidating them across subcommittees.
Task force members on May 12 debated how specific the draft critical threats in the Forest Resilience Plan should be and agreed to a categorization framework to guide consolidation across subcommittees.
Steve [task force member] said his subcommittee used a preliminary set of categories and proposed three broad groupings — "informational obstacles, socioeconomic, and ecological obstacles" — as a starting point for categorizing the compiled threats. Several members supported grouping threats by category so the consultant and consolidation team can merge overlapping items and reduce redundancy.
Members differed on…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
