Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Supervision Revocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judge extends supervision, orders intensive outpatient treatment and driving restriction for man who admitted alcohol violation
Summary
Judge Stephanie Boyd of the 187th District Court denied a motion to revoke community supervision for John Anthony Martinez and ordered a six‑month extension of his supervision along with intensive outpatient treatment and a temporary driving ban until he completes an aggressive driving course.
Judge Stephanie Boyd of the 187th District Court denied a motion to revoke community supervision for John Anthony Martinez and ordered a six‑month extension of his supervision along with treatment and driving restrictions, the judge said during a hearing in Bexar County.
The court found Martinez had violated condition No. 2 by consuming alcohol, a fact Martinez acknowledged in court. "Knowing that, do you still wish to plead true? Court will find violation of condition number 2 true," Boyd said during the hearing.
The judge accepted an agreement between the state and defense to deny revocation and extend Martinez's supervision for six months. Under the court's terms Martinez must complete intensive outpatient treatment and parenting and anger-management classes within 30 days where applicable. Boyd also ordered Martinez to complete an aggressive driving course and said, "there's to be no driving until completion of the aggressive driving course."
Martinez told the court he wanted to avoid jail to remain with his son; Boyd admonished him that continuing violations could lead to incarceration, noting the jail could impose up to one year. "If you don't make better choices, what's gonna end up potentially happening is you're gonna spend a year at the Bexar County Jail," she said.
The court also required proof of completion of the parenting program and verification of anger‑management sessions already in progress before Martinez's next court date. The judge set a return date for review and instructed probation to monitor compliance.
The hearing included statements from the state and defense counsel; probation and drug-testing arrangements were discussed on the record. No jail time was imposed at the hearing, and the formal motion to revoke was denied under the agreed conditions.
Court action in this matter remains subject to compliance with the court-ordered treatment and reporting requirements; further revocation proceedings could follow if Martinez fails to meet the conditions.
