Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Temple Terrace council approves 28‑lot Davis Road subdivision after conditions set
Summary
The City Council approved final site and subdivision plans for a 6.7‑acre, 28‑lot single‑family subdivision at 10024 Davis Road with conditions tied to permitting, stormwater and landscaping.
The Temple Terrace City Council on July 1 adopted a resolution approving final site plans, a preliminary plat and subdivision construction plans for a 6.7‑acre residential subdivision at 10024 Davis Road.
City Planner Malik Hall told the council the project would be reduced to a single development parcel and would include 28 single‑family lots, down from 32 in an earlier rezoning. "Total acreage is 6.7 acres. It is zone plan development, and it is a residential subdivision including 28 single family lots. It was reduced from 32 during the rezoning process," Hall said.
The council's approval was conditioned on routine permitting items, including updated stormwater documentation required by Hillsborough County, landscape buffering details for the lift station, final plat submittal within six months and minor plan corrections. Hall said the development includes on‑site retention and that the developer must provide a proposed street name on the final plat. He noted the county — not the city — controls Davis Road lane width and that some FDOT and county right‑of‑way triangles would affect signage and roadway design.
Council members asked whether stormwater improvements would be reviewed by the council before construction. Hall said the county has reviewed the county stormwater plan and the city will require updated plans at the permitting stage; the only future city council review anticipated is the final plat. City Engineer Brian McCarthy told the council the subdivision's retention design ultimately outfalls to a wetland system that connects to the Hillsborough River.
The council voted to adopt the resolution on second public hearing and second reading. The motion was seconded, and the clerk recorded no nays; the resolution was adopted.
Background: The item was presented as SPR‑24‑08 (final site plan) and SP‑24‑03 (preliminary plat). Even with council approval, Hall explained the developer must submit a final plat within six months for recording and any substantial plan deviations later would require a return to the council.
The council meeting transcript indicates the city will require the developer to provide any outstanding stormwater, landscaping and permitting updates during the building permit process rather than at the current hearing.
