The Mentor Planning Commission on July 3 voted to table proposed amendments to the city code that would regulate short‑term rentals while staff performs additional analysis and refines draft language.

Why it matters: Commissioners discussed two principal approaches — a permit-driven administrative model with fees and technical requirements, and a conditional-use (CUP) approach requiring individual hearings — and expressed preference for the permit model but requested staff research to justify occupancy caps, renewal timing and enforcement steps.

What happened: City planning staff presented two draft approaches and noted key open issues: the basis for any per-unit occupancy limit, whether permits should be annually renewed on a calendar schedule, how to handle existing bookings that span expiration dates, and local notification processes for neighbors. Staff said enforcement language (including possible revocation for repeated nuisance or public-safety incidents) and insurance minimums would be vetted further with the law department.

Commission direction: Commissioners requested that staff produce justification and calculations for capacity limits and sizing, consider a resident-priority mechanism for permit allocation, and clarify renewal and notification procedures. The commission did not adopt final regulations; instead members voted to table the item so staff can return with revised language and supporting analysis.

Outcome: Motion to table the short-term rental ordinance passed; the commission requested follow-up work on capacity formulas, permit process (administrative permit vs. CUP), a grace/renewal window to address bookings that cross calendar years, and additional research on enforcement and insurance thresholds.

Ending note: Staff said finalized language will include concrete numerical justifications and will be presented again to the commission before any recommendation to City Council.