Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shafer Park lighting: Musco 25-year system vs cheaper aftermarket options divides staff and council
Summary
Public Works reported a Musco system quote of $840,837.95 (parts, 25-year warranty and monitoring) and an alternative aftermarket quote (lights $170,863; poles $81,777). Staff recommended the Musco system for warranty and monitoring despite higher total cost, while noting additional rewiring and infrastructure will raise the all-in price.
Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff presented competing proposals and background for new lighting at Shafer Park on July 1, describing trade-offs between a Musco 25-year monitored system and lower-cost aftermarket alternatives.
Public Works said Musco offered a fully warrantied system priced at $840,837.95, with a 25-year parts-and-labor warranty and remote monitoring; Musco—s installation and monitoring model also includes a monitoring center that can detect outages. An alternative vendor provided quotes for lights ($170,863) and poles ($81,777), a package the director said would come with shorter warranties (one year on poles; five years on lights) and would require more city staff work and risk for long-term maintenance.
Staff emphasized additional infrastructure costs that are not part of some vendor quotes: rewiring conduits, replacing or testing existing foundations and pulling new gauge wire that meets manufacturers— requirements. Public Works recommended Musco—s turnkey option when factoring warranty and long-term maintenance. Council asked for previous-installation references, solar compatibility, and a faster timetable; staff said it would obtain further competitor proposals (Bradford) and return at the next meeting with more detail.

