Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Zoning Map topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shelbyville study session reviews two city-owned rezoning proposals; no vote taken
Summary
Council reviewed two proposed zoning map amendments affecting city-owned parcels — a 0.33-acre site and a roughly 30.35-acre tract — that received favorable planning commission recommendations; no final vote occurred at the study session.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Zoning Map topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Shelbyville mayor and city council considered two proposed zoning-map amendments for city-owned parcels at a July study session but did not vote on either proposal.
The first ordinance would rezone approximately 0.33 acre owned by the Shelbyville Industrial Development Board at 218 Eagle Boulevard from C-2 (general business) to I-2 (general industrial); the second would rezone roughly 30.35 acres on North 2764 (Bedford County tax map references provided on the agenda) from C-2 to I-1 (light industrial). Both items were reported to have received favorable recommendations from the planning commission.
Council discussion included procedural questions and a brief reference to the larger 30.35-acre parcel: a council member asked whether the property purchased for a project involving MTSU required rezoning for “70 star construction” (phrase as spoken in the meeting). The study session did not include a public hearing record of testimony nor a final council vote; the ordinances were listed on the agenda as second and final reading items with planning-commission recommendations but were not acted on during the study session.
City staff indicated the items remain on the agenda process; no amendments were proposed or adopted during the session. The record at the study session shows information only: parcel sizes, current and proposed zoning categories, planning commission recommendation and that the properties are owned by the Shelbyville Industrial Development Board or the city.
Why it matters: rezoning changes can affect permitted uses, development intensity and future permit reviews for the parcels in question; council consideration at second reading typically precedes a final vote at a regular meeting.
What’s next: the council will consider formal action at a subsequent regular meeting; no vote or ordinance adoption was recorded at the study session.

