The Town of Needham Stormwater Bylaw Working Group on June 25 revised draft language to clarify administration and permitting responsibilities, saying the bylaw "is administered and enforced by the director of public works," and that permitting authorities may "accept the application as compliant, accept it with conditions, or reject it," Kim (staff member) said as the group reviewed Section 7.5.
The revised language assigns day-to-day administration to the Department of Public Works (DPW) and specifies how applicants should proceed when an activity requires a permit from a permitting authority (for example, the Building Department, Conservation Commission, Planning Board or Zoning Board of Appeals). Kim explained that when a project does not require a separate permit from those boards or departments, the applicant must apply for a DPW street permit and demonstrate compliance as part of that application.
Members discussed enforcement roles. The draft gives DPW primary enforcement authority and allows the building commissioner or conservation enforcement officer to act on enforcement if requested by the DPW director. Committee member Joe Frondack, Building Commissioner, said he supported the clarified language and the addition of a street-permit pathway when no other permit is required.
The group worked through wording to avoid unintended effects: they inserted a conditional-accept option to allow permitting authorities to approve with conditions rather than creating a strict accept-or-reject binary. The final phrasing the committee endorsed for discussion reads: "The applicable permitting authority may accept the application as compliant, accept it with conditions, or reject it based on input from the DPW Engineering Department or in accordance with applicable state or federal laws and regulations. If the application is rejected, the applicant may submit a revised plan demonstrating compliance." Kim said legal staff had reviewed the changes and suggested the regulations be adopted by the Select Board after town-meeting action in cases where the bylaw passes.
The committee agreed to continue editing definitions and the rest of the draft and to aim to finish the full draft by the July 2 meeting, circulate it to other town boards and committees for comment, and use the July 22 Select Board presentation to solicit feedback. Committee members asked staff to prepare a cleaner, less repetitive version of Section 7.5 for the next meeting.
No formal vote on the bylaw text was taken; members directed staff and counsel to produce a revised clean copy for the next scheduled meeting and to coordinate how the companion regulations will be submitted to the Select Board.