Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Judge awards $3,031 judgment in favor of creditor after bench trial over promissory note
Summary
After a bench trial over a disputed promissory note and a series of informal loans, the court awarded plaintiff Gilbert (Gil) Smith $3,031, rejecting some claimed charges as unsupported and striking excessive interest as usurious.
A Cheatham County judge entered judgment for plaintiff Gilbert ("Gil") Smith in a dispute over loans and purchases made for defendant Roy (Craig) Craig (listed in court as Memorial Craig). After a bench trial where both parties and witnesses testified, the court found a signed promissory note for $1,200 but disallowed a $300 interest provision as usurious. The trial court credited certain additional expenditures Smith paid on Craig’s behalf but rejected other claimed items as insufficiently proven.
The judge found the following: the original $1,200 loan was valid and collectible; the $300 interest identified in the promissory note was excessive and the court declined to award it as usurious; the court did not find sufficient proof for an alleged $500 additional cash loan; the court found that $836 paid to redeem four…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

