Commissioners raised persistent concerns about sidewalk obstructions, snow removal and whether code compliance enforces city ordinances. The discussion produced differing accounts of current practice and an agreement to request an official city clarification.

Some commissioners said code compliance staff told them enforcement has been limited — officers generally move obstructions and provide education rather than issue citations, and the division lacks a citation book. Other commissioners pushed back, saying Reggie and code staff have told them the department does perform enforcement in safety cases and can escalate repeat problems.

Because participants reported inconsistent messages, the commission asked the mayor and community development staff to clarify who has enforcement authority, what steps the city follows upon reports (inspection, notice, citation) and whether additional staffing or different processes are required. Commissioners discussed practical interim reporting tips — for example, sending photos with reports so compliance staff can document recurring obstructions — and asked staff to return with a clear flow chart describing responsibilities across departments (code compliance, police, snow removal operations).

On snow removal, commissioners said residents experience long delays and inconsistent results for sidewalk clearing. Commissioners asked staff to combine snow‑removal methodology, coordinated mobility council input and code compliance into a single briefing that clarifies operational responsibilities and timelines for enforcement and clearing during winter weather.

No vote was taken. The mayor agreed to follow up with staff and return next month with a clearer description of enforcement responsibilities and any operational changes.