Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Veterans Cemetery topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Irvine council rejects mayor’s motion to press for municipal veterans cemetery at Great Park; debate over Gypsum Canyon continues

5110896 · May 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A contentious, hours‑long public debate ended with the City Council declining to adopt a resolution pushed by the mayor to support building an Irvine‑run veterans cemetery on the Great Park artist site; supervisors and veterans’ groups pressed that the county‑backed Gypsum Canyon site remains the endorsed, shovel‑ready location.

Irvine — After more than seven hours of public testimony, the Irvine City Council on May 27 declined to adopt a resolution proposed by Mayor Larry Agran that would have directed the city to pursue a municipal veterans cemetery at the Great Park artist site.

Mayor Agran opened the item by reciting the history of efforts to place a Southern California veterans cemetery in Orange County and said the artist site within the Great Park was the place most veterans had sought in earlier public campaigns. The mayor proposed a resolution that would have selected the artist site for an Irvine municipal cemetery, asked the city manager to report back within 90 days with a plan to develop an initial 20‑acre phase and to solicit CalVet’s (California Department of Veterans Affairs) interest in a long‑term transfer of the facility.

Supervisor Katrina Foley and Supervisor Don Wagner spoke against the mayor’s resolution and urged council members to support the Gypsum Canyon site in Anaheim Hills. Wagner and Foley said Gypsum Canyon has broad local, county and state backing, existing funding commitments and a project timeline currently under county management. Foley told the council the Gypsum Canyon project “is happening” with state and county partners and that a county plan is moving forward with funding commitments she described publicly.

Veterans’ groups including Valor and the Veterans Alliance of Orange County also addressed the council. Valor representative Bobby McDonald said veterans sought a county‑recognized cemetery that would be constructed, operated and funded through county and state channels; he and others argued that Gypsum Canyon is the most viable, broadly supported option for an Orange County veterans cemetery.

Opposing public testimony emphasized a different perspective: hundreds of residents in the Great Park area — including many families with young children — said the artist‑site cemetery would be next to schools and active neighborhood parks. Dozens of local residents, including scores of children, told the council they feared the proximity of an active cemetery and the emotional and operational consequences of frequent funerals and military honors near schoolyards. Several residents urged the council to preserve the Great Park framework plan’s library, botanical garden and other public amenities.

The council vote: Mayor Agran moved adoption of the resolution supporting a Great Park municipal cemetery; the motion was seconded. After council debate, the motion failed 3–4 (Council Members Mike Carroll, Martinez Franco and Mayor Agran voted yes; Council Members Goh, Liu, Tresita and Vice Mayor Mai voted no). The mayor later withdrew a related motion.

Council members split on the question of timing, financing and feasibility. Opponents argued a municipal cemetery in the Great Park would be costly for the city to build and operate, and would not qualify for CalVet or federal Veterans Affairs burial benefits unless CalVet formally acquired and operated the site. Supporters of the mayor’s approach argued a phased municipal plan would create an accessible cemetery for Irvine families who currently must travel to Riverside or other distant national cemeteries.

What the council did: with the mayor’s resolution defeated, the council did not adopt any new policy authorizing a municipal cemetery at the Great Park. Several council members asked staff to continue coordinating with the county and state on veterans cemetery issues and to keep the Veterans Memorial Park and Gardens elements of the Great Park framework moving forward.

Why it matters: Orange County lacks a local veterans cemetery; veterans and families pressed for an accessible site for burial and military honors. The dispute pits long‑standing neighborhood planning promises and newly developed Great Park neighborhoods against county‑led plans that many municipal officials and veterans’ groups consider the only shovel‑ready, broadly backed solution.

Sources: Mayor Larry Agran remarks and resolution text; statements by Supervisor Don Wagner and Supervisor Katrina Foley; public testimony (Veterans Alliance, Valor, Great Park residents).