Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
St. Joseph officials give school finance briefing: property tax, SAT and debt limits explained
Summary
District business staff outlined how local property tax, state adequacy funding (SAT), federal aid and debt limits shape the district budget. The presentation explained assessed valuation rates, attendance-based state funding, and bond capacity limits tied to assessed valuation.
District financial staff briefed the St. Joseph School Board on how the district’s budget is built, explaining locally levied property tax calculations, the state adequacy target (SAT), federal categorical funds, and limits on borrowing.
The presenter described local revenue as primarily property tax based, explaining assessed valuation rates used in Missouri: residential property assessed at 19% of market value, agriculture at 12%, commercial at 32% and vehicles at roughly 33.3% of value. Using the district’s levy as an example, the presenter showed the tax on a $200,000 house and on a $24,000 vehicle to illustrate how assessed valuations and different classes of property affect revenue.
State funding mechanisms were a central focus. The presenter reviewed the SAT (state adequacy target), noting historical SAT amounts and recent changes: the SAT was $61.17 in 2007; it rose slowly over time and the district was told of an increase to $67.60, later revised to $67.50 for the coming year, with a projected $71.45 in a following year (state action pending). He noted that the SAT has not kept pace with inflation since the formula’s 2005 enactment.
Attendance and growth were emphasized: state aid is largely attendance-driven (weighted average daily attendance), so absent students directly reduce funding. The presenter also summarized federal funding (Title I, special education, ESSER) and said ESSER-funded projects—such as HVAC upgrades—were fully accounted for in audits.
On capital and debt, staff explained statutory limits: the district’s borrowing capacity is limited by law to a percentage of assessed valuation (described as 15% in the presentation). That cap constrains how much the district can borrow even if voters approve projects, and differences in assessed valuation between districts (he cited Branson and others) create disparities in bond capacity across districts.
Trustees asked clarifying questions about reassessments and how new commercial property gets included; staff said reassessments occur in odd-numbered years and new construction is reflected on the next cycle’s assessed valuation.
