Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement Rfp 2500132 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hillsborough County committee finalizes evaluation scores for RFP 2500132 (renewable natural gas)

5109631 · July 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Hillsborough County procurement committee completed consensus scoring of two proposals for RFP 2500132 to process landfill gas into renewable natural gas at the Southeast County Landfill, awarding Wagga Energy a higher final score after applying DMDWBE bonus points.

A reconvened Hillsborough County procurement committee confirmed final consensus scores for RFP 2500132, the county’s solicitation to convert gas from the Southeast County Landfill into renewable natural gas.

The committee, convened by Brian Johnson, division director of the Solid Waste Management Department, evaluated oral presentations from two firms and confirmed weighted scores across four evaluation criteria: similar projects/references (20 points), project approach and schedule (20 points), qualifications and financial resources (20 points) and price proposal (40 points). The committee also applied a 5-point DMDWBE bonus where applicable.

The scoring process focused on technical clarifications and firms’ capacity to handle nitrogen and other impurities in landfill gas. Casa Damina, the county’s chief buyer, opened the meeting and reminded attendees that the session was recorded and that the county’s cone of silence remained in effect. Committee members questioned and discussed technology, nitrogen-processing capacity and financial strength before reaching consensus on each criterion.

After discussion, the committee confirmed these consensus scores for the two proposers: Treba Renewables — criteria 1: 16; criteria 2: 20; criteria 3: 20; criteria 4: 35; final consensus score: 91. Wagga Energy — criteria 1: 18; criteria 2: 19; criteria 3: 20; criteria 4: 35; DMDWBE bonus: 5 points; final consensus score: 97.

Committee members said clarifications during the oral presentations prompted several upward adjustments in the technical and qualifications categories. Participants specifically noted that additional presenters or partners who described the gas purification system and the firms’ financial backing helped resolve earlier uncertainties about whether the proposed technology could process the expected nitrogen concentration.

The meeting record shows no formal motion or roll-call vote; the committee reached consensus on scores and then confirmed them aloud. Casa Damina said staff would compile the evaluation summary and department recommendation and would post the meeting recording after it was processed. She also said she would prepare the final scoring spreadsheet for committee signatures before members left the meeting.

The county limited active participation to committee members for this reconvened evaluation; public attendees were permitted to view the meeting but remained on mute. Casa Damina told the group that the cone of silence would end at the earlier of five business days after the county posts its notice of intent to award the contract or the date the procurement solicitation is canceled.

The evaluation results will be included in the department’s recommendation to procurement officials; the transcript and recording will be posted per county procurement procedures.