Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears state budget update; members flag House Bill 335 threat to local millage
Summary
Superintendent and staff told the Solon City Board the state budget process currently favors the district but flagged House Bill 335, which proposed eliminating ‘inside millage’ and could have removed an amount equivalent to about $9 million for the district if enacted.
District leaders briefed the Solon City Board on the status of the Ohio state budget and a related bill that district officials said they believe posed a risk to local revenue.
The superintendent told the board that the budget process had progressed through the governor, House and Senate and that, overall, the budget package would give Solon schools more money than in prior years though that increase still represents only about 5% of the per‑pupil funding the district uses. The superintendent credited local advocacy with persuading legislators to leave certain draconian provisions out of the final budget.
School officials warned the board about House Bill 335, legislation that during deliberations would have required previously “inside” (unvoted) millage — about the first 10 mills of property tax collections — to be placed before voters. Officials said the change could have eliminated roughly $9 million (about 10% of the district’s budget) if implemented as originally proposed. The superintendent said the most severe sections of HB 335 were not included in the enacted budget but cautioned the board to watch for similar proposals in the next legislative cycle.
Why it matters: inside millage, as explained to the board, supports schools, police, firefighters and other municipal services under the state constitution; a requirement to re‑vote that millage would shift revenue decisions to ballot measures and could force district budget and personnel changes.
Discussion, directions and decisions
Discussion: District officials described advocacy efforts with state legislators, referenced carryover balance rules in the budget and noted a raise in the carryover threshold to about 40%, which staff said eased immediate administrative burden.
Direction: Staff will continue monitoring the legislative session and coordinate advocacy should similar bills reappear in the fall.
Decision: This was an informational update; no board policy change was proposed or adopted.
Ending: Officials thanked community advocates and reminded the public that further legislative developments in fall could require renewed outreach.
