Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drain Commissioner Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board sends drain-commissioner pay proposal to finance after discussion of duties and retroactivity
Summary
After a lengthy discussion about the scope of the drain commissioner's duties and past pay changes, the board referred a proposal to establish a salary formula to the finance committee; the current pay is $50 annually and the commissioner requested restoration to his pre-2013 level ($6,000).
The board directed staff to take a proposal on drain-commissioner compensation to the finance committee for development after Drain Commissioner Dean Auger requested a salary increase and reimbursement for travel and expenses.
Auger, who said he has used his personal vehicle, phone and email for drain-related duties, told commissioners he would be comfortable returning to the pre-2013 salary level. During discussion, Auger recounted travel to projects across the county and said the job involves inspections and coordination with multiple jurisdictions.
Commissioner Johnson suggested tying pay to performance or expense reimbursement so the county would not simply guarantee a higher flat salary for an elected official who might not perform duties. County staff noted that state drain law (referenced in meeting as the drain code of 1956, Section 280.31) requires the drain commissioner to report annually to the board about active drainage districts and work performed and allows the county to pay “actual necessary expenses” in addition to salary.
Board members agreed the matter merits a formula and referral: a motion to send a suggested amount and compensation format to the finance committee passed. Commissioners discussed whether any increase could be retroactive and asked staff and legal counsel to clarify whether retroactive pay is permissible or whether a one-time bonus could be used as an alternative.
The board did not set a final salary; commissioners asked the finance committee to return with a recommended formula and any legal guidance about retroactivity before the full board acts.
