Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K 12 Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison board hears extensive K–12 curriculum revisions, new CTE pathway and NGSS alignment
Summary
Board members described a months-long teacher-led curriculum redesign that adds an Investment Analysis course, aligns K–12 science to NGSS, and introduces hands-on science kits for classrooms.
MADISON — The Madison Public Schools Board of Education on Tuesday heard a detailed report on a large-scale, teacher-driven revision of the district’s K–12 curriculum that includes new career-and-technical-education offerings, a reorganization of high-school science courses and a districtwide alignment to the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).
The report, delivered during the curriculum and student development committee update, outlined revisions across career and technical education, science, theater and world language courses and described a new Investment Analysis course as part of a career pathway in insurance, securities and investments.
Committee member Steven (last name not provided) told the board that the curriculum work was “a culmination of a great deal of work by a whole host of people, teachers, and administrators,” and that teachers designed units using backward design to align learning experiences and performance assessments with the district’s graduate profile and standards. “Our curriculum isn't just about what students learn, it's about who they become,” he said.
The presentation emphasized hands-on, phenomenon-centered science instruction from kindergarten through grade 12 and described new classroom “science kits” intended to support active investigations. Committee members said the district built a system to track and replenish kit supplies so materials remain available across classrooms.
Board member Maureen (last name not provided) highlighted the committee’s work mapping units to both NGSS performance expectations and the district’s Graduate Profile, calling the science revisions “way more encompassing” than simply preparing students for tests. Maureen said she was moved by teachers’ presentations and praised the emphasis on student agency and real-world application.
No formal action was taken at the meeting; the update was presented as a committee report and board members were encouraged to review the detailed materials in the meeting packet. Board members suggested preserving the recorded curriculum presentation as a resource for future boards and stakeholders to show the district’s curriculum-development process.
The committee said about 57 teachers participated in the multi-month effort to revise and refine units, with particular emphasis on vertical alignment and a sequence of performance expectations. The district described the changes as focused on developing transferable skills, critical thinking and student-led investigations rather than traditional lecture-based teaching.
Board members repeatedly praised the teacher-led process as a driving factor in the reforms and thanked central office staff for supporting the work. The presentation included specific sequencing changes for science 6–8 and 9–12 as well as revisions to entrepreneurship coursework and the addition of Investment Analysis to the CTE offerings.
Board members encouraged fellow members to review the packet materials for specifics on lesson design, assessments and resource lists. The committee did not present or request a vote on adoption at the meeting; materials and recommendations were provided for board review and future action if required.
