Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agriculture Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee narrows where farming will be emphasized in draft master plan
Summary
After lengthy debate, the committee directed staff to include "farming" alongside "agriculture" in the draft plan glossary and to treat farming as an explicitly considered use across growth areas, with more limited encouragement in urban areas and stronger recognition in rural and some suburban areas.
The Jefferson County ad hoc master plan committee directed staff to add "farming" alongside "agriculture" throughout the draft master plan and negotiated how the draft should treat farming in urban, suburban and rural growth areas.
The committee discussed multiple options and landed on a compromise approach: farming will be added to land-use text and the glossary; the plan will not encourage farming as a primary land use in urban areas, but staff were asked to reflect farming more prominently in rural areas and to treat farming as allowed (and in some suburban locations explicitly noted) with appropriate site-suitability and implementation caveats.
Why it matters: How the master plan characterizes agriculture and farming affects future policy direction, public expectations and how staff and the council will approach implementing land-use and zoning changes during the UDO rewrite. Several members said they want to avoid encouraging uses in denser neighborhoods that could create conflicts (for example, small-lot livestock operations), while still supporting existing agricultural activity and larger farms.
Key points from debate: - Committee members asked staff to add "agriculture/farming" everywhere the plan uses the word agriculture so the two terms are interchangeable in the document. - Multiple council members urged that farming remain permitted countywide but not presented as a "primary" encouraged use in urban areas where smaller lots and denser development raise potential conflicts. - A compromise favored labeling farming primary in rural planning areas and secondary (or conditional) in urban areas; some members requested making it primary in certain suburban locations where large lots and current land use patterns make farming appropriate. - Staff said these land-use labels are guidance and would not by themselves create new permitting rules — regulatory changes require separate UDO work and future legislative action.
Staff will update the land-use matrix and map notation (for example, the black-dot legend in the draft) to reflect the committee's direction and circulate a revised draft for committee review.
