Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Northfield Point Revetment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fall River redevelopment authority authorizes bidding, OKs chair to award small invasive-management contract
Summary
The Fall River Redevelopment Authority authorized staff to put the Northfield Point revetment project out to bid and voted to let Chair John Erickson award a related invasive-species contract up to $75,000; members discussed Seaport grant timing, cost estimates and winter work limits.
The Fall River Redevelopment Authority on June 25 authorized staff to bid a Northfield Point shoreline revetment and invasive-species management package and voted to allow Chair John Erickson to sign a contract for the invasive-species work up to $75,000 if awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
The action matters because staff said timely bidding would produce cost estimates the authority can use while the city awaits possible Seaport grant funding; members repeatedly flagged uncertainty about the state grant schedule and about whether grant rules or seasonal constraints would limit when work can occur.
Karen Martin, project manager, told the authority “the bid package will be on the street July 14 with a pre bid meeting at the site July 23, and bids are gonna be due July 31.” She said the invasive work was budgeted at $60,000 and will be paid from Seaport-related grant funds already awarded to the authority.
Board members debated two paths: expedite award so work can begin this year, or delay to wait for the next Seaport grant round. Martin and Sarah Page, executive director, told the authority the Seaport program has moved its grant window to “fall 2025” and that the authority’s previously awarded fiscal‑year 2024 Seaport (C4) grant had been amended so some design funds can be used for construction now. Page said the authority could bid now and decline to award if board members were not comfortable with the prices that come in.
Members also questioned consultant cost estimates. Board discussion referenced a consultant labeled “Beta” whose budgeted contingency (15%) some members said was high; members compared Beta’s figures to an earlier GEI estimate. Sarah Page summarized that until bids are received ‘‘you don’t really know’’ which line items will come in high or low.
The board voted to let staff advertise the larger project for bids and to allow the chair to execute a contract for the invasive-species construction if the low responsible bid is at or below $75,000. The motion to authorize staff to bid the revetment and return with numbers passed by recorded voice votes.
Discussion only: members noted seasonal constraints tied to the winter flounder breeding season (January 15–May 31) and said that even with turbidity curtains the state may not permit in‑season work. Members also noted that if the project exceeds planned amounts, additional approvals or grant matches would be required.
Next steps: staff will finalize the bid package, solicit bids under the advertised schedule, and return to the authority with bid results for formal award or further direction. If bids are received by late July, the authority expects to have price information in time for the August meeting.
