Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board extends superintendent’s contract, attaches midyear evaluation; vote splits on duration and governance concerns
Summary
The board approved an amendment extending Superintendent Fred's contract through June 30, 2028, and attached a midyear evaluation letter praising community engagement, facilities planning, problem solving and advocacy. One director raised governance and legal concerns during the discussion; the contract amendment passed 4–1.
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Mercer Island School District Board of Directors voted to extend the superintendent’s employment agreement through June 30, 2028, and attached a midyear evaluation letter summarizing board observations about the superintendent’s work.
The board’s written letter, read at the meeting, commended the superintendent for community engagement, facilities planning, problem solving and funding advocacy; it noted the district’s work to rebuild fund balance and described efforts to design a nurse staffing plan that balances student health needs with cost reductions. The draft letter and contract amendment were made available on the district’s board portal.
Board members offered praise during the public discussion. One director said the superintendent had provided “countless briefings” to legislators and community members and called him an “effective voice” with elected officials. Several directors described the job as an "ultra marathon" that requires endurance and commended the superintendent’s leadership during a challenging year.
A separate director raised governance concerns and referenced a January 14 letter and principles the director said should govern superintendent conduct and board oversight; that director also criticized elements of personnel policy and raised questions about severance related to alleged misconduct. The chair interrupted that line of discussion and reminded members of the legal limits on public comment and executive-session topics. Another director said the allegations were legally constrained and must follow state law regarding personnel and litigation confidentiality.
The motion to approve the contract amendment passed with a reported tally of 4 yes and 1 no. The meeting record shows the board voted to extend the rolling contract by one year (a three‑year rolling contract extended to continue through mid‑2028) and attached the evaluation letter; the board did not record an increase to salary in the amendment.

