Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Government topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board convenes executive session on superintendent evaluation, approves personnel recommendations

5093055 · June 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Using authority in 25 O.S. § 307(B)(1), the Deer Creek school board met in executive session to discuss the superintendent’s ongoing evaluation and contractual terms and later approved the superintendent’s personnel recommendations in open session by a 3-0 vote.

The Deer Creek school board voted to convene an executive session to discuss the ongoing evaluation and contractual terms of the superintendent under 25 O.S. § 307(B)(1). The motion to convene the session passed 3-0.

The board announced, upon returning to open session, that present during the executive session were Stanlin Green, Kelly Lay, Chris Adamson and Dr. Jason Perez. After the executive session the board then considered and approved the superintendent’s personnel recommendations as listed on the meeting’s personnel schedule; that approval passed 3-0.

“Present in the executive session was Stanlin Green, Kelly Lay, and Chris Adamson, and doctor Jason Perez,” the board stated when documenting the closed-session attendance. The agenda item described the executive session as a discussion of the superintendent’s ongoing evaluation and contractual terms under the cited statute.

The meeting record shows the board approved the superintendent’s recommendation concerning employment as listed on the personnel schedule, but it does not include names, positions, salary figures, or other personnel details in the open transcript. The board recorded the motion to approve the personnel recommendations and the vote tally—Kelly Lay, Stanlin Green and Chris Adamson all voted yes—but did not enumerate the individual personnel actions in the public portion of the record.

The board adjourned the meeting after the personnel vote. No additional personnel details or contract changes were read into the public record during the open session.