Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Athletics Eligibility topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Anonymous public comment alleges non‑Parkrose players on varsity basketball; superintendent opens investigation

5092720 · June 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An anonymous public commenter alleged the Parkrose High School varsity basketball starting five included students from other districts; the superintendent said he learned of the tournament that morning and will investigate with the coach and affected players.

An anonymous public comment read at the Parkrose School District 3 board meeting alleged that the starting five at a recent varsity basketball tournament included students enrolled at other Portland schools and that complaints have already been filed with the Oregon School Activities Association (OSAA).

The anonymous commenter wrote that the starters in the game at PCC Cascade were students who attend Grant, Roosevelt and Ida B. Wells high schools, and said the situation had “drawn a lot of negative comments” and that “a few complaints have been filed with OSAA already.”

The superintendent told the board the district learned of the tournament the morning of the meeting and that he would investigate. “We want you to be here, and we want you to be part of the community. But I don't wanna bring kids who don't live here to play sports,” he said. “I wanna win. I wanna celebrate wins, but I don't wanna win at any cost.” He said he would speak with the coach and players and review the facts, noting summer basketball has a development focus.

The superintendent asked for patience while the district gathers information and said he would update the board after fact‑finding. He also said he wanted to hear from players who are “being immediately impacted.” No formal disciplinary action was announced at the meeting.

The public commenter was read anonymously; the board did not provide a public response beyond the superintendent’s pledge to investigate.