Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civic Recognition Award topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staunton council discusses creating a “Spirit of Staunton” recognition; details and process left to future work
Summary
Councilors debated criteria, frequency, nomination and review processes for a proposed Spirit of Staunton recognition during a work-session discussion; members generally supported the idea but deferred rules and final procedural placement to later work.
Staunton City Councilors spent extended time during a June 26 work session discussing the creation of a new civic recognition called the Spirit of Staunton, intended to honor long-term contributions to the community.
Nut graf: Council members broadly supported the concept — praising volunteerism, leadership and cultural contributions — but left key questions on criteria, nomination, review and whether the award should replace or sit alongside existing recognitions for later work by staff and council.
Councilor Beauregard introduced the concept after a recent recognition for an individual and asked council whether they wanted a higher-level award than the existing certificate and proclamation options, what values it should celebrate, and whether recipients should be residents, organizations, or be eligible posthumously.
Councilors debated frequency (annual, quarterly or as-needed), whether the award should be limited to volunteer activity or could include professional achievements, and whether organizations as well as individuals should be eligible. Several councilors said they liked the name “Spirit of Staunton” and preferred leaving frequency open or awarding the recognition on an as-needed basis rather than a rigid schedule.
Council discussion also covered review process and implementation logistics. Members suggested a nomination form with prompts and that a small group of council members and staff vet nominations rather than handling awards only at full council. Councilors discussed whether the recognition should be presented in council chambers or at a location chosen by the honoree and concluded chamber presentation should remain an option while allowing off-site ceremonies when requested.
Ending: Council asked staff to compile notes from the discussion, draft procedural language and bring back options for a future meeting so the council can adopt formal criteria and a nomination-review process.
