Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Taxes And Revenue topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brandywine outlines tax-rate reset after county reassessment; tax warrant expected July 9
Summary
Brandywine School District finance staff told the board the 2025–26 tax rate must be reset to a revenue‑neutral amount because Newcastle County’s reassessment raised total assessed values, and the district expects to vote the tax warrant at its July 9 meeting once county appeals and related legislation are resolved.
Brandywine School District finance staff told the Board of Education that the 2025–26 tax rate must be reset to a revenue-neutral level because countywide reassessments increased total assessed value.
At a June board meeting, a district finance presenter said the reassessment means the overall tax rate will fall but the impact will vary by parcel: “Some parcels will pay less taxes, some will pay more taxes, and others will pay just about the same,” the presenter said. The presenter said state law allows districts to increase revenue by up to 10 percent after a reassessment, but the district does not plan to use that allowance.
The presenter told the board that the calculation of the new rate depends on several outstanding items held by Newcastle County: a file of ‘‘at‑risk’’ assessments reflecting property appeals; an updated elderly tax exemption value; and a recalculation of the Newcastle County tax pool, which currently incorporates the first 46.8¢ of the district tax rate. The presenter said the district has 652 appealed parcels (about 10 percent commercial, 90 percent residential), while the county has more than 5,000 appeals to resolve.
Those at‑risk appeal amounts reduce the effective assessment base the district can rely on when setting a revenue‑neutral rate. The presenter explained the concept with an example: a fixed dollar revenue target requires reducing the per‑dollar rate when assessed values rise. The presenter also warned that the reassessment will produce a shift of tax burden toward residential parcels in the district.
On the elderly exemption and tax‑pool issues, the presenter said county actions and pending state legislation affect the district’s calculations: the county has adjusted the exemption for its own taxing authority, but district treatment requires state code changes. Regarding the Newcastle County tax pool, the presenter said the pool’s fixed value (46.8¢ in 2025) must be reset to a lower numeric rate that yields comparable revenue under the new assessed base.
The timeline the presenter gave calls for Newcastle County to provide an updated at‑risk assessment file in June and for related legislation to be resolved before the board finalizes the warrant. The board plans to adopt the tax warrant at its July 9 meeting, which the presenter said aligns with the county deadline for submitting the warrant.
Action and next steps: the presenter did not place a tax warrant on the floor for a vote at the June meeting. Board members were told staff will return with final numbers after the county completes appeals and the listed legislative items are resolved.
Why it matters: the rate reset determines how the reassessment’s aggregate increase in valuation is distributed across individual property owners. With appeals still outstanding and state/county actions unresolved, the district cannot yet publish parcel‑level tax impacts.
