Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage Water Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carver County continues County Ditch 23 redetermination after public hearing; viewers to explain municipal-benefit math
Summary
The Carver County Board continued the County Ditch 23 redetermination proceeding and directed the viewers to prepare detailed findings and a clearer explanation of how municipal (urban) benefits and outlet charges were calculated for the board’s June 3 meeting.
The Carver County Board continued the public proceedings on the redetermination of benefits for County Ditch 23 and instructed the viewers to provide a clearer explanation of how they calculate municipal (urban) benefits for the board’s June 3 meeting.
Lead viewer Scott Henderson presented the results of a reexamination the board had requested after a February hearing. Henderson said viewers had rechecked benefits in portions of Laketown Township, examined City of Waconia stormwater discharges (including the school district), reviewed time-of-travel issues for remote watershed areas, and analyzed four township ditches that outlet into the main ditch system.
The viewers adjusted some benefit calculations after lake attenuation analysis for Reeds Lake reduced benefits in portions of the watershed by about 6.3%. Henderson said roughly 16,675 acres would be benefited under the revised configuration (down from earlier figures shown at roughly 40,533 watershed acres and current benefits at about 800 acres under a different baseline), and identified non-benefited acreage on individual properties where land remains in a near-presettlement (wetland) condition.
Multiple landowners spoke during the reopened public comment period and urged the board to address localized flooding and equity concerns. Property owner Joseph (Joe) Neeson said about 20 acres of his farmland flood annually; viewers designated approximately 24.15 acres on his property as non-benefited to reflect land that was not cultivated and therefore not placing a burden on the ditch. Other speakers and farmers described large municipal outlets and urban runoff from Waconia and Cologne that send water to the ditch system and asked why urban acres are assessed at a lower per-acre rate than agricultural acres.
County attorney and viewers explained that drainage law and the drainage handbook support classifying land by use and that agricultural land historically receives benefit ratings because ditches were designed to improve agricultural productivity. Viewers said they analyze travel time, land class and watershed characteristics when assigning benefits and that township ditches that outlet into the main system were given an outlet charge approach to avoid double-assessing landowners.
After extensive public comment and commissioner questions focused on the municipal runoff math and on-the-ground impacts, County Attorney John Kolb recommended the board continue the hearing to allow staff and the viewers to produce a detailed draft of findings and to add an explanatory appendix on how municipal/urban benefits were calculated. Commissioners voted to continue the hearing to the board's regular meeting on June 3, 2025, and to direct viewers to provide the requested municipal-benefit explanation along with draft findings. The motion passed 4–0 with Commissioner Fahey abstaining.
Ending: The board set June 3 as the continuation date and asked staff and the viewers to prepare a detailed findings-in-order draft, an explanatory explanation of municipal-benefit calculations and any clarifying materials for commissioners and affected landowners prior to that meeting.
