District recommends $125,000 classification and compensation study; board asked to add $45,000 from fund balance

5080304 ยท June 26, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent recommended awarding a compensation and classification study to Educational Planners for $125,000 and amending the general-fund budget to add $45,000 from fund balance to cover the full cost; the board will consider the item on the July 8 consent agenda.

The superintendent recommended the district award a compensation and classification study to Educational Planners of Marietta, Georgia, for $125,000 and amend the general fund to provide an additional $45,000 from fund balance at the July 8 consent agenda.

During the June 24 work session, staff said the study will review both salary schedules and classification of non-teaching job descriptions (roughly 120 positions), with the aim of improving internal alignment and external competitiveness. The district received seven proposals; staff said only two vendors met minimum qualifications for prior Georgia K-12 experience and that Educational Planners scored highest on references, work samples and a plan to rewrite non-teaching job descriptions as part of the engagement.

Nut graf: District leaders described the work as a roughly six-month project intended to produce both updated compensation charts and revised job descriptions to guide hiring, placement and retention. Staff recommended the higher-scoring vendor despite a budgeted amount of $80,000, and asked the board to amend the budget to allocate $45,000 from fund balance so the study can proceed.

Cost rationale and timeline: The superintendent said Ed Planners bid $125,000 and the district had originally budgeted $80,000. The study team expects a timeline that would conclude around December'January if approved. Board members asked about the range of proposals and the per-job-description fees quoted by lower-cost vendors; staff explained that some lower-cost bids charged additional per-description fees that could exceed the district's budget once all positions were rewritten.

Ending: The superintendent asked that the award and the budget amendment be placed on the July 8 consent agenda for board action.