Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utilities Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City staff and consultant recommend continuing five‑year water rate plan; July 1 increase remains on track

5078602 · June 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff presented a GovRates technical memorandum analyzing 10 months of utility revenue and recommended continuing the five‑year rate plan adopted last year. The next step is a July 1 rate increase under the schedule previously approved by the commission.

City staff told the commission Tuesday that an updated technical memorandum from GovRates analyzing 10 months of revenue through April supports continuing the five‑year water‑rate plan the commission previously adopted.

Why it matters: The multi‑year rate schedule funds capital, operations and debt service for the city’s water and wastewater systems. Changes affect household monthly bills and are politically sensitive; staff presented the analysis to explain how the July 1 increase fits the previously approved plan.

What staff said: The city manager summarized the memorandum prepared by the city’s rate consultant, Brian Mance of GovRates. The report reviewed utility revenues through April 30 and recommended continuing implementation of the five‑year plan that served as the basis for last year’s ordinance and related loan agreements. Staff said the recommended July 1 adjustment was consistent with the plan and noted the new phase would not reintroduce the prior multi‑tiered billing change that had generated mixed bills last year.

Context and customer concerns: Commissioners and staff reviewed earlier customer complaints about inconsistent bills after last year’s rate restructuring. Staff explained that some of the prior confusion resulted from changing sewer calculations (moving from a winter‑quarter average to a different methodology) and from shifts in tiered usage bands; those factors produced widely differing percentage changes for customers depending on their winter‑quarter usage patterns. Staff said the city had provided individualized comparisons to many customers post‑implementation and expected fewer large unexpected increases this July because base and sewer‑calculation changes are already in place.

Rate specifics: The technical memorandum and resolution in the packet show the July 1 increases on the schedule. For example, a three‑quarter meter base rate line in the packet shows a change from about $19.37 to $24.21 and a per‑unit consumption charge increase from about $2.88 to $3.60; GovRates recommended continuing the planned schedule for future years. Staff also said irrigation rates had been reviewed and the city’s irrigation charges remain at or below many peer communities; staff agreed to provide comparative irrigation rate data to the commission as requested.

No formal vote: The presentation was a staff briefing and discussion; commissioners asked for an emailed copy of the irrigation comparisons and for a plain‑language example of how a typical household bill will change under the July 1 adjustment.

Ending: Staff said they will finalize the implementing resolution and move forward with the July 1 change under the approved five‑year schedule and provide the supplemental billing examples and irrigation comparisons requested by commissioners.