Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comments Facilities Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge caution on bus depot site, Jarretown project and district spending during public comments
Summary
Speakers at the May meeting raised concerns about locating a bus depot in residential areas, urged the board to consider alternative office-park sites, questioned spending priorities including a $1.4 million furniture grant, and pressed the district on debt and tax pressure.
Several residents used the public-comment period at the Upper Dublin School District legislative meeting to press the board on facility siting, capital projects and district spending.
Nut graf: Two commenters asked the board to avoid placing a bus depot near schools and in residential neighborhoods, recommended looking at office-park options instead, and urged fiscal caution on a large furniture grant and other spending while taxes and district debt remain concerns.
Janice Sandberg (resident of Van Sant Lane) expressed opposition to siting a bus depot in residential areas and near schools, saying, "The properties that are by the schools should be off limits. They're residential areas. They're too close to the schools." Sandberg urged the board to "look in the office park" for sites and warned repeated community opposition if a residential site is pursued.
Jenny Vitella of Ambler, speaking as a volunteer post-prom organizer, also addressed facilities and budget priorities. Vitella praised volunteers and then raised facility and fiscal questions, asking why the district had not toured Fort Washington Elementary School (recently renovated) before touring other facilities and asking whether the district is required to spend a reported $1,400,000 grant on furniture. She said, "I think it's not an appropriate time to buy an a nice to have versus a need when we're talking about a 4% tax increase" and urged the board to prioritize needs.
Vitella also raised concerns about district debt levels and pending commercial appeals that may affect future revenues: "We pay $14,000,000 a year in debt," she said (commenter’s stated figure). Both speakers asked the board to consider longer-term fiscal impacts when planning capital projects such as Jarretown.
The superintendent and board responded to process questions about construction bidding: the superintendent explained that large construction projects require competitive public bidding and separate trades bids under state rules. The board thanked volunteers for post-prom work and noted upcoming dates for community events.
Ending: The board did not take formal action on the siting or grant questions during the meeting; staff and the board said they would follow competitive bidding and standard procurement procedures for major construction and capital projects.
