Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fire Safety Systems topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Deltona Wellness cited for nonfunctioning fire-alarm communications; 30 days to repair or face daily fines
Summary
Inspectors found the Deltona Wellness alarm system in a sustained trouble state due to a nonworking phone line and a missing smoke detector; the special magistrate ordered corrections within 30 days and set $50-per-day fines for each outstanding violation (up to $100 total per day).
Deltona Wellness LP was ordered on June 25 by a special magistrate to repair fire-alarm communication failures and a missing smoke detector at its 1200 Deltona Blvd. suites within 30 days, or face fines of $50 per day for each outstanding violation (a combined $100 per day if both issues remain).
Why this matters: A functioning alarm, an operational central-monitor signal and properly installed detectors are fundamental to fire protection and emergency response. The city's fire-safety inspector said the building's alarm system remained in a trouble condition because the phone line was not transmitting signals to the central monitoring station and a smoke detector in the medical-records room was missing.
Fire inspector Jory Bailey told the magistrate that follow-up inspections on Jan. 16, Feb. 25, April 4, May 15 and June 24, 2025, repeatedly showed the alarm in a trouble state and that a vendor report dated Feb. 10, 2025, identified the dialer as nonfunctional and the central station as not receiving signal. Bailey said the system cannot be reset to normal while the phone-line fault persists.
The city requested 30 days to restore service; the magistrate ordered repairs by July 25, 2025. The city also noted the property was operating under a fire-watch procedure (hourly patrols sent to monitor the building) while repairs were pending.
Deltona's fire code references and NFPA guidance were read into the record; the inspector said documentation of repairs or replacement parts must be filed with the city once work is complete. The magistrate admitted the case file into evidence and ordered the owner to notify the code inspector to verify compliance.
Ending note: The magistrate's order sets a short compliance window intended to restore automated notification of alarms to central dispatch; the inspector noted the building remains on fire watch until the system is returned to normal operation.
