Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance And Ethics topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Granite County delays final decision on removing study-commission member; hearing set for July 1

5072307 · June 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners discussed whether to remove Dr. Gary Snyder from the county study commission after Snyder sent notices and threatened litigation; the commission set a July 1 hearing to decide removal.

Granite County commissioners discussed potential removal of Dr. Gary Snyder from a locally formed study commission after Snyder declared himself acting chair and attempted to post meeting notices, prompting legal concerns and a lawsuit filing.

County staff reported that two study-commission seats had resigned and that the commission had advertised for appointees. Staff said Dr. Snyder sent emails asserting he was the acting chair and asked county staff to post notices for a July meeting; staff declined to post a notice. The county reported that Dr. Snyder had filed a lawsuit and attempted personal service improperly, according to staff remarks.

Commission discussion centered on whether Snyder’s actions—self-designating as chair and directing public meeting notices—constituted grounds for removal under county code. One speaker referenced Montana statutes and county code (including a provision allowing removal for cause under county rules) and advised that the commission should give Dr. Snyder an opportunity to respond in person.

Decision and next steps: commissioners agreed not to remove Dr. Snyder immediately and scheduled a final decision and possible removal hearing for 10:30 a.m. on July 1, 2025. Commissioners requested staff prepare documentation and legal citations and to notify Snyder so he can appear and present his side at the July 1 meeting.

Why it matters: study commissions are often the first step in citizens’ efforts to consider governmental changes; membership disputes can affect the commission’s ability to function and raise legal exposure for the county.