Commission approves extension of executive-coaching contract for water department after debate over cost

The Dayton City Commission voted to approve a contract extension for executive coaching services to the water department after commissioners debated the length and cost of the engagement.

The vote matters because the contract funds ongoing coaching and succession-planning work in the water department that city staff said supports grant-seeking and prepares staff for leadership vacancies.

Commissioners removed the item from a bundle to consider it separately, then moved and approved the city manager's recommendation for item 2. The motion to approve item 2 was moved, seconded and adopted by voice vote.

Keesha Kenny, introduced as acting director (speaking for the water department), described the scope of the engagement and the department's reasoning for an extension. She said the coach has "broken down silos" within the department and has supported succession planning and executive coaching for supervisors and bargaining-unit staff. Kenny said the water department has experienced turnover and that the coaching helps prepare staff for higher-level certifications and supervisory duties.

Commissioners pressed for details. Commissioner Fairchild asked, "So Doctor. Burrows has broken down silos. That sounds like something that's completed. What's the next outcome that we're looking for with Doctor. Burrows?" Kenny answered that the work includes executive coaching for supervisors, succession planning and preparing staff for certification tests required in the water industry.

A commissioner raised concerns about cost and rebidding. The transcript records questions about an hourly rate cited as $385 per hour and an overall contract amount referenced as "$65,000." One commissioner said, "I would ask to remove this item, from the calendar so I can vote separately. I'm frustrated." That motion was accommodated and the commission proceeded to a separate vote on the item; the transcript records the chair calling for an affirmative voice vote to approve item 2.

No formal roll-call vote tally was recorded in the minutes; the transcript indicates the item passed by voice vote after discussion. Commissioners asked staff to provide more information about future contracting and to revisit contract procurement practices; staff and commissioners also cited examples of grant funding and internal improvements the department attributed in part to the coach's work.

The commission did not direct additional conditions on the contract during the meeting; staff said they will provide follow-up information about contracts and costs on request.