Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Behavior And Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Farmington schools report mixed results after first year of cell-phone policy; students cite inconsistent enforcement
Summary
District leaders told the board the new policy limiting student personal device use reduced distractibility and improved in-person interaction, but high-school students and some teachers reported inconsistent enforcement. The board asked administration to follow up with staff supports and report back in August.
District staff and building principals told the Farmington School Board that the district’s first year using policy 10/22 (student use of personal mobile phones and devices) produced reduced student distractibility and more in-person collaboration, but students reported inconsistent classroom enforcement—especially at the high school.
Chris Bussman, director of secondary learning, summarized the district’s approach and told the board the policy aimed to “set the expectation” and create “a supportive yet consistent, and I think really important, a predictable environment for learners.” He said the district leaned on site teams to develop building-level procedures that fit their grade levels.
Principals from elementary, middle and high school levels described implementation steps that included summer communications to families, signage, teacher guidance on tiered responses (gentle reminders up to more formal steps), and classroom posters outlining a four-step response. Andy Nelson and Sean Peck said most elementary and middle school students adapted quickly; middle-school staff reported about 80% of students had no violations for the year.
High-school students and some board members said enforcement varied by classroom and teacher. Student board members described wide differences in practice between teachers and across days, saying that some classrooms used pouches or caddies while others did not. One student said, “Most of my classes, it wasn't really enforced. I don't think I once saw the step thing actually used with a teacher.” Another student described being on edge because enforcement varied “every single classroom.”
Principals and district leaders acknowledged the inconsistency and told the board they would follow up. Superintendent Berg and board members asked administration to return in August with recommended, practical supports for teachers so enforcement could be more consistent. Board members suggested low-cost, district-provided solutions such as uniform pouches or caddies to remove barriers for teachers who would otherwise need to buy classroom equipment.
School leaders also called out specific device types: smartwatches and wireless earbuds (AirPods) can be harder to manage than phones. Middle-school principals said they generally asked students to remove AirPods; smartwatches that did not present a clear distraction were sometimes allowed. Board members asked for clarification and a districtwide reminder on those device categories.
No formal policy changes were enacted at the meeting. The board directed administration to gather teacher input on supports (for example, inexpensive classroom caddies) and to report back with an implementation plan and any costs by August.
