Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Lcap Local Indicators topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bassett Unified reports mostly met local indicators; district flags 15 staffing misassignments and gaps in electives access

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District leaders presented local indicators used in the LCAP, reporting that most local measures were met, parent engagement is strong, and that staffing coding errors produced 15 misassignments; the board discussed EL student access to electives and scheduling constraints.

Bassett Unified administrators presented the district’s California Local Indicators used to inform the Local Control and Accountability Plan and reported that most indicators were met, while calling out specific staffing misassignments and equity issues for students in English learner and special education programs.

Dr. Julie Harrison, leading the presentation, said local indicators exist because “not everything can be measured on our regular state dashboard,” and described how the district uses local data alongside state dashboard results to set LCAP goals and improvement strategies. The presentation covered basic services and standards implementation, parent and family engagement, student engagement, school climate and access to a broad course of study.

Key findings and concerns: Harrison reported the district met Area 1 (basic services) and Area 2 (implementation of academic standards) but recorded 15 section misassignments flagged during coding and staffing reviews. She explained those misassignments arose from middle‑school elective wheel coding, a few teachers lacking EL authorization, and some teachers holding intern credentials that are not fully accepted by the state reporting rubric. “We had 15 section misassignments,” she said, and characterized that number as relatively small in the context of the district’s full programing but something the district is addressing.

Parent and climate measures: Harrison praised local parent engagement efforts and the Family Leadership Institute, saying the district has “high marks in building relationships between our school staff and families.” On school climate, she reviewed results from the Healthy Kids survey: Harrison cited that about 68% of fifth graders reported there are high expectations for them, rising to 84% among students in grades 7, 9 and 11; she also noted a decrease in students reporting feeling sad or hopeless, which the district views positively.

Access to electives and credentialing constraints: Board members raised concerns that some EL and special education students miss elective offerings because of schedule constraints in 6‑period middle‑school schedules and credentialing limits for multi‑subject teachers. Harrison said the district is pursuing scheduling workarounds (zero periods, summer school or master‑schedule adjustments) and emphasized a reclassification push for EL students so they can access electives earlier. A board member noted the district has been working to code elective wheels to show arts, esports and STEM offerings without triggering misassignment flags.

Why it matters: Local indicator reporting feeds the LCAP, which drives district priorities and resource allocation. The misassignments can affect state reporting and must be corrected; access issues affect equity for EL and special‑education students.

Next steps: Administrators said they will continue to refine coding and scheduling to reduce misassignments, pursue credentialing solutions and expand pathways so EL and special‑education students can access electives.

Board response: Trustees praised parent engagement and staff work on indicators and asked for further detail in follow‑up briefings. Several trustees offered thanks to staff for the presentation and attention to family engagement.