Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Peer Review Audit Office topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Metro auditors pass peer review; two management‑letter comments addressed

5064158 · June 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A peer review by outside auditors found the Metro Auditor’s Office met professional standards, with two management‑letter comments about documenting communications with governing bodies and clarifying sampling reporting; the office updated policies and templates in response.

The Metro Auditor’s Office received a “pass” rating in a peer review conducted under the Association of Local Government Auditors process and reported the results to the Audit Committee.

Lauren Riley, Metro auditor, said reviewers Jenny Scott (Portland) and Matthew Cheetle (Dallas) examined the office’s policies, audit projects and staff understanding of auditing standards (the Yellow Book). The reviewers rated the office “pass” and praised staff competency, organized work papers and audit committee involvement.

The peer reviewers issued two management‑letter comments tied to 2018 audit standards the office had only partially implemented: first, documenting communications that set roles and responsibilities for audits with governing bodies; and second, clarifying how sampling results are reported in audit reports (including methodology and whether results can be projected to a population). Riley told the committee the office has updated its policies and audit templates, begun standard email notices to chairs of boards and commissions describing planned scope and team members, and revised report language on sampling methodology.

Riley said the peer review also produced informal verbal recommendations about operational clarity; the auditor’s office revised the “how to audit” guide to reduce implied language and provide clearer step‑by‑step guidance for staff while preserving audit flexibility.

Why it matters: Peer review under professional standards provides an external check on the auditor’s work and the committee’s oversight. The office implemented the reviewers’ recommendations and said it will continue documenting audit communications and sampling procedures.