Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the General Government Operations And Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee holds public hearing on reappointments to Guam Land Use Commission
Summary
The Guam Legislature committee on land held a public hearing for two reappointment nominees to the Guam Land Use Commission, focused on transparency, quorum, conflict-of-interest rules and the land-application review process; no confirmations were voted and the record was kept open for seven days.
The Committee on Land, Environment, Housing, Agriculture, Parks and Infrastructure held a public hearing Oct. 11 to consider reappointments to the Guam Land Use Commission, hearing testimony from nominees Ronald Panglinan and Leilani Flores and taking public questions on commission processes and transparency.
Ronald Panglinan, who identified himself as a commissioner on the Guam Land Use Commission, told the committee, “It’s an honor to be here once again to ensure my position as a commissioner on the Guam Land Use Commission.” He said his year on the commission has taught him “a lot,” particularly about the multi-step application review process, and he suggested the commission consider reducing the number of public hearings applicants must attend.
Senator Will Parkinson praised Panglinan’s character and judgment, saying he “wholly support[s] his nomination.” Committee members asked Panglinan about recusal and conflicts; Panglinan said he has not recused himself and that the commission operates under existing legislation and rules.
Leilani Flores, a member of the Guam Land Use Commission since February 2019, described her service and said she has recused herself in at least one case, stating, “I recused myself for the Puente Dos Amantes Towers.” Flores told the committee she reviews commission materials regularly and said the commission coordinates with land-management staff and other review bodies when evaluating zone-change requests.
Committee members pressed both nominees on transparency and process. Senator Tydewey emphasized the importance of posting up-to-date meeting minutes and public materials online so neighbors and applicants can follow land-use decisions, saying, “The most important thing is the minutes of the meeting. That has to be on there because people who are watching… need to know what’s going on.” Members also raised concerns about quorum problems that have delayed proceedings in prior years and about whether applicants are going directly to the Legislature for zone changes instead of following the commission’s process.
No formal confirmation votes were recorded during the hearing. The committee chair kept the record open and instructed staff that written statements on the hearing will be accepted for seven days and may be submitted to the committee office; the chair also said members expect to consider confirmations in a future legislative session. The hearing lasted about 24 minutes and concluded without a committee vote.
The hearing covered: the nominees’ qualifications; internal commission practices (number of public hearings per application; website posting of minutes and materials); attendance and quorum concerns; and conflict-of-interest and recusal practices. Committee members asked the nominees to check and, where appropriate, propose improvements to the commission’s procedures and public materials.
The committee invited additional written testimony for seven days following the hearing and did not take a confirmation vote that day.
